Thread:KinHikari/@comment-31352869-20131206214230

 "Our admin nomination process says you can't nominate yourself to prevent the abuses described above. But it doesn't take into account long time dedicated users who could be an admin if someone would nominate them, but no one does.

To correct that, I think nominating yourself would be okay after a little more time, such as 9 months/750 edits or 1 year/1000 edits."

This is an excerpt from the 97th tri-state gazette that was published back in August. Since, RRabbit42 said that and from what I saw none of the current admins messaged him about it and so I assume that this change in whether you can nominate yourself would apply now. I want to nominate myself to become an administrator and am allowed to based on this correction that RRabbit was going to apply. However I am very hesitant to do so because I first want to be positive that I am allowed to do that since in the administrators page it still says under the nominating a user section that you can't nominate yourself, and second I want to be nominated by someone else rather then myself because to me it looks better to be nominated by someone else. On that note the nominations were opened up Sunday and no one has nominated someone to become an admin, so the sooner the voting process is started on electing a new administrator the better.  