Forum:Featured Article voting/Archive/Unsuccessful nominations 2010

Articles that were nominated in 2010 to be a Featured Article on the wiki's main page, but did not receive enough votes to win.

Fireside Girls
Nominated by: 98.185.59.8, 00:04, February 10, 2010 (UTC) Reason(s) for nomination: YO! I think this would be a great article. Well written, lots of photos,very very decent quality. Awesomely awesome.


 * Strong oppose: In dire need of help from every angle—unsourced, cluttered, messy, etc. See the O.W.C.A. for what an organization FA looks like. I'll give you a bit to see if you can improve it (which, by the way, is what you're supposed to do at an FAN); if not, I'll be forced to fail it. Cheers, The Flash  {talk} 20:27, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Opposed: I am going to have to agree with Flash here. The article seems very disorganized, and needs to be cleaned up. BigNeerav 00:37, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Result: Did not pass

Gimme a Grade
Nominated by: 68.107.108.92, 19:33, April 5, 2010 (UTC) Reason(s) for nomination: I think it's an awesome song that deserves some recognition.

No votes were cast in favor or opposing the vote.

Result: Did not pass

Mariachi Tree
Nominated by: 98.185.48.50, 23:16, January 11, 2010‎ (UTC) Reason(s) for nomination: This Article is good without a single typo. Sure it's not lengthy, but it is of great quality to be Featured Article.


 * Strong oppose and closing this premature nomination: You clearly didn't read the rules carefully enough. Yeah, sure, it's got okay writing style, but that doesn't mean jack compared to all the other rules. Plus, length does matter in this case, as it most indefinitely counts as a stub and therefore does not meet coverage criteria. I am sorry, but next time, please nomination an article that isn't so small that its text doesn't even surpass its infobox. Thank you, The Flash  {talk} 00:13, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Result: Did not pass

Phineas and Ferb Hawaiian Vacation
Nominated by: 94.4.82.82, 15:25, July 7, 2010 (UTC) Reason(s) for nomination: none


 * Oppose: Sorry, but it is much too early to nominate this page. The episode just aired and the page is still being filled out. — RRabbit42 ( leave a message ) 03:53, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Same here, try again in a few weeks. Isabella and Lego Liker 04:30, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Per above. The Flash  {talk} 04:36, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

Result: Did not pass

Stacy Hirano
Nominated by: Mochlum, 15:03, August 5, 2010‎ (UTC) Reason(s) for nomination: I nominated this article because it has a good length, no grammer problems, and describes much about the Character Stacy!


 * Info: no votes were cast, so nomination has been closed. —RRabbit42 ( leave a message ) 00:49, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Result: Did not pass

The Beak
Nominated by: Zacbio, 01:02, March 12, 2010‎ (UTC) Reason(s) for nomination: A lot of information, a great summary and basically no problems. Pretty well done. I belive it has FA status.


 * Yeah, it is a great article, and the episode is great!! Daisy (I wuvv Ferby!!) 01:10, March 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Pretty good shape, but some comments: (PLEASE address these) article needs a lot more images; the "References" section needs to be scrapped; and lead needs to be changed to normal episode article's leads immediately. After that, I'll definitely support this. :D The Flash  {talk} 01:23, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose: It has been generally perceived that the article needs cleanup in prose and needs to improve on its POV. I apologize, but we are forced to fail it. Dooby Dooby Doo-Bob 23:47, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Result: Did not pass