Thread:Patrickau 26/@comment-2076042-20130805043753/@comment-3477287-20130814144745

For the message wall archives, those blocks were warranted. Why they were blocked was clear. No further reasoning was needed.

For 120d, he/she really did include speculation. What he/she did was wrong, but he/she shouldn't have been blocked on the spot. He/she should have been given a memo that what he was doing was wrong instead of an immediate block. But this is a case of strictness. In no way has KinHikari abused her position.

I guess the thing here is that we need to follow the block policy more closely, like the previous generation did: "Give a warning/memo first, then block if the user's unacceptable behaviour continues. If said behaviour continues after the initial block, increase the block for each offense. If a user is clearly a vandal, then no more negotiations or discussions will be needed. Just block him/her."

@Tannerlees9 off-topic, but which wiki do you frequent or how long have you been in wikia? You're the first user I've been unable get any info on. Don't take this the wrong way, it's a process I do for any user new or old. It helps me determine a person's credibility and classify them as either veteran user, new user, or even sockpuppet in some cases. No offense, but I'm highly suspicious that you're a sockpuppet. It would really help your credibility for this thread if you answer my question.