Thread:RRabbit42/@comment-3477287-20130721011128/@comment-3477287-20130721155037

For Skiddley Whiffers (game): The biggest (in my opinion) problem there was already in the first sentence of the page: "Skiddley Whiffers is a board game seen in the episode of the same name." Then there was the fact that "Skiddley Whiffers" on the page's first image was not italicized. "Monopoly" was also not italicized. ("Skiddley Whiffers") and the infobox were last minute additions that I only saw while editing. Again, the biggest problem I had with it was the page's first sentence. You can see it here.

For Ferb Fletcher: First, repeated links. Second, words which should be italicized aren't. There are others but stating them all will just make this reply unneccessarily longer.

The guidelines say that nominations must follow all policies, and as seen above, the two pages do not follow all policies. I know I may look pathetic or nitpicking at this, but it just annoys me how unworthy pages are being nominated for FA. FAs represents the wiki's best. If people see those and think it's the wiki's best, then it would leave the wrong impression. I understand you're reasoning, but I can't agree on how you settled on these pages. It would have been better to delay, or add none, or just search for a different page.