Thread:RRabbit42/@comment-2156322-20130317230825/@comment-5093389-20130318020557

Isabella and Lego Liker wrote: Bloxdude47 wrote: AgentGoldfish wrote: I'm just going to point out a bit of hypocrisy here.

You've been complaing because you think I kick too much. I don't, but for the purpose of this demonstration, let's pretend I do. Now, I refuse to kick someone, and now this is your problem. Can you make up your mind over what I do wrong, and stick with that story? Because I'm not following any of your logic here. If you had such a problem with it, why would you ask me to kick him, and not just do it yourself? Take charge, spread those wings and fly. Now, I'm not on anyone's 'side' here, but 'they' aren't nessicarily being hypocrites. If you do kick too much, (not saying you do, I wouldn't know) and suddenly there's a moment where someone should be kicked, and you don't kick them, (or disagree with kicking them) then to anyone who believes you kick too much, this is icing on the argumental cake. Not only (in their opinion) do you kick to much, but you also kick unreliably.

Now, I think someone who gives out their password should be warned, then kicked if they do it again. Please note that as of the time I posted this, I have never gone on chat, so I have no idea as to who is in fault in this brouhaha.

It would be AG's fault for saying we can give out personal information.

Yeah, it's a bad example to simply let someone give out their personal information. Unless he repremended him for it, but it would be best to kick him on the second time, so any new users joining chat wouldn't be fooled into thinking it's okay.