Thread:Weeklybob/@comment-26573805-20150905170936/@comment-1647442-20150910195728

This thread intrigued me, so I'm butting in. Wikipedia can be a good source of information. CAN be. Not automatically is. If something's unsourced on Wikipedia, don't take it as fact. It can't be proven based on that evidence alone.

If you truly have correspondence with Dan Povenmire, please, post the transcript of your e-mail. There are several other users that have posted theirs, and it needs to be used as evidence. Of course, if that's not an option, I suggest tweeting him and/or Swampy, they've been known to respond to fan questions fairly often (even I've talked to them on twitter).

Until you can provide actual, indisputable evidence, then it shouldn't be added to the wiki. There's no proof that you actually spoke to Dan, so for all we know, it's possible you're making it up.