Talk:Isabella Garcia-Shapiro/2008-2009 Archive

PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER TEMPLATE! IT IS FINE THE WAY IT IS!!!--SuperFlash101 23:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Who is changing the character template? And why are you yelling in caps about it on Isabella's talk page? —Topher 04:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Template, is that the box that contains the characters info? -Audun 05:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Audun


 * I believe that's what Flash is talking about, but I'm not sure and from what I can tell, it hasn't been changed. —Topher 19:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I just mean that every other page has been changed with the other template. I, myself, don't like it, so I just want this at least to be the one I like. -S. Flash (Talk) 21:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * What don't you like about the other template? Other than being smaller to match the wiki-ad space at the top of the page, isn't it the same as this one? —Topher 22:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, there's more than that that's different. The font is smaller, and the image that goes in there always come out bad, where it's all pixily and wide. Also, on the "family" part of it, you can't include other things like their cousin or even, in Dr. Doofenshmirtz's case, clones. Those are the reasons I don't like it, because, honestly, it doesn't look that good and can't contain the information it needs. --Flash 101 (Talk) 15:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * If you don't like the infobox, then let's fix it. Let's find some sort of compromise solution for this; I'll take it point by point. I originally made the font smaller in order to fit a similar amount of information in the smaller space due to wanting to match it to the ad space at the top. We could make it bigger again, or somewhere in between. Next, the picture can be easily fixed. The problem now is that all images get automatically "upsized" to 293px wide, and proportionately long, essentially zooming in on a picture causing pixelation. I think if I take out the forced resize, smaller pics will stay original size and larger pics can be set to match the infobox width. As far as cousin is concerned, I suppose I could put them in there, but then I don't see a reason to have "other family" in there, too. How would you put Doofenshmirtz's clones in there? they have no names. It doesn't seem to me to be something that needs to be included in an infobox. I suppose technically they could be put in with the use of a variable for the row heading. Then you could put in whatever you wanted. I suppose we could also put hair color and eye color back in, but since we have a pic of the character when we use an infobox, this seems unnecessary. Also, we could put "Created by" back in, but since we don't know who really created each character, it usually ends up being a link to Dan Povenmire and Swampy Marsh. Remember, an infobox is not supposed to be a substitute for an article, just someplace to get a quick overview at a glance. —Topher 19:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * That sounds great! Let's do that! And, P.S., what I was planning to do for Doofenshmirtz and his clones put, "Slovenly Clone (Deleted) Shriveled Clone (Deleted) Hundreds of others (Deleted)". Anyways, thanks, and I'll be looking for that! Thanks, Toph! --Super Flash (Talk) 04:28, 7 September 2008 (UTC)