Thread:RRabbit42/@comment-5120967-20120825044815/@comment-5120967-20120826035343

Even then it wouldn't work well if you can convince a chat mod to side with you. In this instance, Mouse was active and admitted to seeing the episode, and other active users at the time had already seen the episodes. So there was no spoilering whatsoever in that regard. IaLL was away then came back and issued judgment based on Mouse's opinion that I violated the rule he personally created.

What's to stop someone else from being idle in the chat then crying to a mod that things where spoiled while they were away because they saw previous messages when they came back?

Also, earlier today I did receive a half-hearted apology from Mouse so I'm good with him and am still waiting on IaLL but while idle today, Mouse also said my comments were "like a spoiler" and I had apparently complained to two supers, one who wasn't even in the chat at the time that I recall. I was just continually tried to defend my position to Mouse and anyone else who was accusing me and was unfairly kicked for trying to explain a point in a polite manner. No harsh words were said and there was no reason for the kick other than an abuse of power.

If anything should come of this, it should be improved rules overall and better vetting of chat mods that can be better unbiased and fairly decide who to kick/ban instead of letting senior members or their own attitude influence their decision.